"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>    Hmm, could be, I think I've always had problems with choosing the right
> gamma numbers. At the moment assumed_gamma is set to .75, which looks ok to
> me.

Uh!

I keep having no idea (and can't seem to learn) which of all those gamma
settings to set to 1.0 and which to set to 2.2 - but I know for sure that there
should *not* be a .75 *anywhere*...

Post a reply to this message